Showing posts with label Governor Chris Sununu. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Governor Chris Sununu. Show all posts

Saturday, June 6, 2020

New Hampshire U. S. Senate candidate Andy Martin says his threat of a lawsuit to ‘Free New Hampshire’s beaches’ was a motivating factor in convincing state government to expedite reopening the seashore




News from:
ANDY MARTIN /2020         
Republican for U. S. Senator
New Hampshire

www.AndyMartin.com
www.FirstRespondersOnline.us
Headquarters:
E-mail: AndyforUSSenator@aol.com
P.O. Box 742
Manchester, NH 03105-0742
Cellphone: (347) 960-9593
Fax (866) 214-3210
Blogs:
www.AndyMartin2020.blogspot.com
www.AndyMartin2020.wordpress.com

---

Attention, New Hampshire, Washington, National daybook/assignment and Political editors

News conference details:

Who: U. S. Senate candidate Andy Martin

What: Andy Martin claims victory in battle to reopen New Hampshire’s beaches

When: Saturday, June 6, 2020; 12:00 P.M.

Where: In front of Manchester City Hall, One City Hall Plaza

---

Andy Martin has been battling to reopen New Hampshire since the start of May. He has been pushing President Trump to speed up reopening nationally since late March.

Andy says there is absolutely no scientific evidence to justify closing beaches or properly-managed swimming pools; fresh salt air and water make it highly unlikely the virus can spread at beaches

Andy predicts reopening of New Hampshire will now accelerate: “The walls are crumbling,” he says “People are fed up”

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

(MANCHESTER, NH) (June 6, 2020) --- New Hampshire Republican U. S. Senate candidate Andy Martin cites President John Kennedy for the claim that “Victory has a thousand fathers, but defeat is an orphan.” “I am a proud father of efforts to expedite the reopening of New Hampshire,” Andy says. “Many worked to reopen New Hampshire. As a nationally respected litigator I was one of the earliest, most persistent and most effective in convincing the governor to avoid the embarrassment of a lawsuit to ‘Free New Hampshire’s Beaches.’”

“Just a few days ago a very limited reopening was announced. My lawsuit was in the final stages of preparation. Friday the governor said new ‘health’ information mandated a further reopening. What new information? The facts did not change over a week. Public opinion is changing; the threat of an embarrassing lawsuit is a change factor.

“The governor may have also realized that state Democrats want to delay reopening to defeat Republicans in November.

“I first attacked the ‘emergency’ on May 1st (please see link [1] below). On May 8th I sent the governor a letter predicting a lawsuit if the delays persisted (please see link [2] below). Finally, on May 31st I ridiculed my primary opponents for being ‘cowardly candidates’ and failing to take a stand for reopening the state (please see link [3] below). They are still silent, and still cowards. I have been open and public and on the record for months.

“The governor also remembers I settled a major legal claim with the Attorney General in 2018 (the ‘Sanborn transcripts’). He probably did not want me to file a lawsuit and then have the AG settle it.

“I never acted as someone hostile to the governor. I support him for reelection. My view is the governor was misinformed; the same way President Trump was misinformed by so-called ‘experts’ in Washington. Because I follow events on a global basis I saw that other regions were having better results than we were in New Hampshire. President Trump gave the state freedom to reopen but the governor was not using it. Last week, in just a few days, the governor shifted from ‘no beach blankets’ to ‘have at it.’

“Georgia reopened six weeks ago; other states were also early reopeners. New Hampshire was a laggard. We are still not at 100%. The Hampton Beach parking restrictions are problematic. But there is not enough of a dispute left to justify a lawsuit. I am hopeful the governor will wake up and start looking beyond Concord for his inspiration. We need to reopen New Hampshire 100% and fast.”

---

Please feel free to forward and/or post this email

---

LINKS TO THIS STORY: (cut and paste the entire link below and not just the underlined portion):



[3] https://andymartin2020.blogspot.com/2020/05/u-s-senate-candidate-andy-martin-says_31.html

ANDY MARTIN - A BRIEF BIO:

Andy Martin is a legendary New Hampshire-based muckraker, author, Internet columnist, talk television pioneer, radio talk show host, broadcaster and media critic. With over fifty (50) years of background in radio and television and with decades of intelligence, investigative and analytical experience in Washington, the USA and around the world, Andy provides insight on politics, foreign policy, military and intelligence matters. For a full bio, go to: www.AndyMartin.com. See also www.FirstRespondersOnline.us; www.BoycottABC.com/executive_director.htm

Andy has also been a leading corruption fighter in American politics and courts for over fifty years and is executive director of the National Anti-Corruption Policy Institute. www.AmericaisReadyforReform.com.

He holds a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Illinois College of Law and is a former adjunct professor of law at the City University of New York (LaGuardia CC, Bronx CC).

He is the author of “Obama: The Man Behind the Mask” [www.OrangeStatePress.com] and produced the Internet film “Obama: The Hawaii’ Years” [www.BoycottHawaii.com]. Andy is the Executive Editor and publisher of the “Internet Powerhouse,” blogging at www.contrariancommentary.wordpress.com and www.ContrarianCommentary.com.

Andy’s family immigrated to Manchester, New Hampshire over 100 years ago; today his home overlooks the Merrimack River and he lives around the corner from where he played as a small boy. He is New Hampshire’s leading corruption fighter and Republican Party reformer.

UPDATES:

www.twitter.com/AndyMartinUSA
www.Facebook.com/AndyMartin

Andy’s opinion columns are posted at ContrarianCommentary.com, ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com and ContrarianCommentary.wordpress.com

[NOTE: We try to correct any typographical errors in our stories; find the latest version on our blogs and don’t hesitate to let us know if you find an error.]

----------

To become a regular subscriber to our emails please send an email to andyforussenator@aol.com and place “SUBSCRIBE” in the subject line

© Copyright by Andy Martin 2020 – All Rights Reserved

Monday, May 11, 2020

U. S. Senate candidate Andy Martin opposes any further Wuhan Virus lockdown in New Hampshire, vows to challenge any attempted extension by the state government. Andy says “Free the beaches!”


GOP U. S. Senate candidate Andy Martin says Governor Chris Sununu should end what Andy says is now an unconstitutional “emergency” that is strangling the quality of life in New Hampshire. Andy will take legal action to block any extension of the current “emergency” declaration and may engage in civil disobedience to test the constitutionality of the state’s burdensome and intrusive regulations.

News from:
ANDY MARTIN /2020         
Republican for U. S. Senator
New Hampshire

www.AndyMartin.com
www.FirstRespondersOnline.us
Headquarters:
E-mail: AndyforUSSenator@aol.com
P.O. Box 742
Manchester, NH 03105-0742
Cellphone: (347) 960-9593
Fax (866) 214-3210
Blogs:
www.AndyMartin2020.blogspot.com
www.AndyMartin2020.wordpress.com

---

May 8, 2020

Governor Chris Sununu
State Capitol
107 N. Main Street
Concord, NH 03301

Dear Chris:

I am writing to ask you to end the purported “state of emergency” in New Hampshire and to reopen the state for the use and enjoyment of its citizens. I also write to ask that you retract your proposed regulatory scheme and allow businesses to resume normal operations.

Because I am one of your strongest supporters this is a difficult letter to write. I voted for you in the past and I will vote for you in November. I want you reelected at all costs. But I believe the coronavirus course you are following is dangerous to your reelection as well as dangerous to the future of the state.

I.

There is no emergency at this time; end the “emergency”

A. In early March there was a genuine emergency. The confused nature of the coronavirus misled many officials, both Democrats and Republicans, to be surprised in early and mid-March. The so-called “models” were a sham and predicted millions of deaths. We had no idea what would happen nationally, or locally in New Hampshire. Therefore, I do not question the declaration of an emergency in March. It is what it was, a decision based on flawed facts.

B. Our Democratic Party opponents never tire of telling us to follow the “science” and “facts.” Well, what are the science and facts? Fact number one: According to NHPR, approximately 75% of New Hampshire coronavirus deaths were in nursing homes and care facilities (please see link [1] below), NOT in the general population. The number of non-nursing related deaths is infinitesimal. Governor  Andrew Cuomo likes to say every life is “priceless.” But every life is not priceless. People are killed and injured all the time. Courts and insurance companies have little difficulty monetizing the price of life. No one can rationally suggest that the entire state should be imperiled to protect a single life.

Right now, 1.3 million people are suffering economically in New Hampshire, in order to possibly avoid a handful of deaths that occur outside nursing homes. Children are hungry, rent and mortgages are behind, and property owners have difficulty paying property taxes to run the state. State government is constantly trying to talk down New Hampshire’s tourism business.

I do not believe you can or should ethically endanger the lives of 1.3 million people to save a handful of otherwise endangered lives. On the contrary, by diluting the anti-coronavirus effort and applying it to all 1.3 million people, you fail to concentrate protective efforts on saving the most vulnerable. The state’s current policy has the perverse impact of endangering the vulnerable while destroying the lives of 1.3 million people without any justification for that approach. (The moronic TV ads saying you are “killing your grandparents” just by trying to live a normal life are just that, moronic ads.)

C.  The emergency which existed in March no longer exists. In fact, the lockdown has endangered New Hampshire’s medical system and cost hospitals hundreds of millions of dollars in lost income, much of which will never be recovered. So, once again the lockdown policy has the perverse effect of destroying hospital and medical resources, not protecting them, for future use.

D. The coronavirus situation is a serious public health crisis. But we deal with public health controversies on a regular basis without shutting down the state. How many viruses has China sent us in recent years? We don’t know. But our state medial system clearly has adequate medical resources to deal with the minimum impact of the coronavirus in New Hampshire. Thus, as a matter of “fact” and “law,” there is no basis for emergency action at the present time. Therefore, the emergency declaration should be allowed to expire in a few days.

II.

When is a beach not a beach?

A. The state’s proposals seem to create a distinction between beaches. If you want to use a beach at a lake, that’s apparently OK. But if you want to use a beach at the ocean, that’s illegal. What is the constitutional basis for the distinction? What is the factual basis? (I much prefer the ocean to lakes.)

B. The Hampton Beach situation is pathetic. People showed up last weekend – great – and the police want to shut down parking and limit access to a great state resource (please see link [2] below). Ocean beaches may be among the safest places to be. There is the salt air, the salt water and the bright sunshine which helps kill the virus. There is not a scintilla of evidence to suggest beaches are dangerous and yet Hampton Beach Police want to limit parking and limit access to the beach. It’s hysteria unbound. It’s stupid. Barney Fife policing.

My family has been going to Hampton Beach for over 100 years. The beach has never been closed that I am aware of. There is no basis to close ocean beaches now. When I go, I often see out-of-state license plates. So what? Is the whole world presumptively infected? That’s simply not the case. Ocean beaches are perhaps the healthiest places for people to park, picnic and enjoy themselves in the sun. Free Hampton Beach!

III.

When is a restaurant not a restaurant?

My understanding is that restaurants will only be allowed to seat people outside and on a limited basis. Is the state trying to ensure that the restaurant industry in New Hampshire goes bankrupt? What if it rains? What if it gets dark? Or what if, as we have next week, a cold front slides in? New Hampshire in late August also starts getting chilly at night. The state’s proposals limiting restaurant operations will destroy jobs and undermine our economic future. It’s a nonsense approach.

IV.

A “goofy government” approach could be toxic in November.

A. Right now, the “polls” (which I doubt) show you doing very well. But if the state stays locked up with a cockeyed approach to business over the summer, I can guarantee you that you will be very unpopular in October and November. There is no way the public will accept much more lockdown lifestyle. The stay-at-home approach worked for a while, but that gig is over.

You are going to face serious hostility if you try to implement your latest set of proposals. I can’t predict what the virus will be doing on the 4th of July but I can guarantee you what the public will be doing on 4th of July: cursing you out for destroying their state and denying Granite Staters a chance to visit a beach.

B. Please don’t fall into the Kelly Ayotte trap. Kelly Ayotte was a decent senator. I endorsed her and voted for her. But she was ham-handed in her relationship with voters, and especially Republicans. She lost a race she should have won, and she may have also dragged down Trump with her. Ayotte had a way of irrigating Republicans and conservatives which led a few thousand GOP voters to reject her. She had a decent record. But she fumbled away her reelection for no good reason (I will write more about her next week).

Please do not fumble away your reelection through a false sense of complacency that the complicated proposals and regulations you seek to impose on 1.3 million Granite Staters will remain popular, because those rules are based on a nonexistent “emergency” and will only worsen conditions in the state, not improve them. You will be demonized by the Democrats before you know it and, like Ayotte, you will have lost Republican votes by unnecessarily imposing an illogical regulatory scheme on the state.

V.

The Swedish model has yielded a much better outcome than the USA one; why not study it and try to adapt it?

Sweden is an advanced society, comparable in many ways to the United States. But Sweden did not lock down, and has an economy that is the envy of the world. Sweden adopted reasonable regulations, ending large sporting events and public gatherings, but leaving groups of up to 49 people alone. Bars and restaurants did not close. Children stayed in school. The result is that while the United Kingdom and the United states brutalized their populations and devastated their economies, Sweden did not. Sweden did not avoid all deaths but the results there approximate USA conditions without the self-induced economic collapse.

In New Hampshire, a huge percentage of the coronavirus cases are along the Massachusetts border. Why punish the entire state for a highly localized problem in a small slice of Southern New Hampshire? Once again, current state policy makes no sense. How is impoverishing 90% of the state because of an unhealthy situation in 10% of the state a sound policy?

CONCLUSION

In summary:

A. I respectfully request that you not renew the nonexistent emergency when it expires in a few days.

B. I respectfully request that you trust New Hampshire institutions and individuals to make their own decisions. We are a state with an unusually intelligent and highly practical population. Institutions such as hospitals and businesses will make sound decisions to adopt their enterprises to necessary procedures. People do not want to get sick; they can adopt approaches that protect them.

C. If the emergency declaration is renewed, I am planning to launch a civil disobedience campaign to challenge the constitutionality of the emergency and the draconian policies the state is proposing. Please don’t make me do it. I want to be able to cheer you on, not challenge your decisions.

D. No plan can cover everything and mine does not. But I am only proffering a sensible and practical analysis of what can be done to help people, not drag down the state any longer. The great minds in state government are trying to kill a mouse with a machine gun. Do everything that can be done to protect our vulnerable population, where the illnesses and death are concentrated. But do everything you can to roll back the state’s burdensome and often contradictory approach to regulation for healthy, low-risk citizens. End it, don’t mend it.

Let’s meet at the beach and have a ceremony burning the emergency declaration. You’ll be glad you did.

With sincere best wishes,

Andy


---

Please feel free to forward and/or post this email

---

LINKS TO THIS STORY: (cut and paste the entire link below and not just the underlined portion):



New citations after emailing:

ANDY MARTIN - A BRIEF BIO:

Andy Martin is a legendary New Hampshire-based muckraker, author, Internet columnist, talk television pioneer, radio talk show host, broadcaster and media critic. With over fifty (50) years of background in radio and television and with decades of intelligence, investigative and analytical experience in Washington, the USA and around the world, Andy provides insight on politics, foreign policy, military and intelligence matters. For a full bio, go to: www.AndyMartin.com. See also www.FirstRespondersOnline.us; www.BoycottABC.com/executive_director.htm

Andy has also been a leading corruption fighter in American politics and courts for over fifty years and is executive director of the National Anti-Corruption Policy Institute. www.AmericaisReadyforReform.com.

He holds a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Illinois College of Law and is a former adjunct professor of law at the City University of New York (LaGuardia CC, Bronx CC).

He is the author of “Obama: The Man Behind the Mask” [www.OrangeStatePress.com] and produced the Internet film “Obama: The Hawaii’ Years” [www.BoycottHawaii.com]. Andy is the Executive Editor and publisher of the “Internet Powerhouse,” blogging at www.contrariancommentary.wordpress.com and www.ContrarianCommentary.com.

Andy’s family immigrated to Manchester, New Hampshire over 100 years ago; today his home overlooks the Merrimack River and he lives around the corner from where he played as a small boy. He is New Hampshire’s leading corruption fighter and Republican Party reformer.

UPDATES:

www.twitter.com/AndyMartinUSA
www.Facebook.com/AndyMartin

Andy’s opinion columns are posted at ContrarianCommentary.com, ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com and ContrarianCommentary.wordpress.com

[NOTE: We try to correct any typographical errors in our stories; find the latest version on our blogs and don’t hesitate to let us know if you find an error.]

----------

To become a regular subscriber to our emails please send an email to andyforussenator@aol.com and place “SUBSCRIBE” in the subject line

© Copyright by Andy Martin 2020 – All Rights Reserved

Friday, May 1, 2020

New Hampshire U. S. Senate candidate Andy Martin says he will oppose an extension of a lockdown order for New Hampshire. Andy says there is no “emergency” and the lockdown is unconstitutional. Liberate New Hampshire! Free Granite Staters!



GOP U. S. Senate candidate Andy Martin says a proposal to “reopen” New Hampshire to be released on Friday, May 2 is, on the contrary, a death wish for the state and will entomb the state’s economy for years. Andy strenuously opposes and objects to the “bureaucratic and regulatory state” that is being imposed on Granite Staters. Andy will soon begin a campaign of civil disobedience to help lift the yoke of enslavement from state residents.
News from:
ANDY MARTIN /2020         
Republican for U. S. Senator
New Hampshire

www.AndyMartin.com
www.FirstRespondersOnline.us
Headquarters:
E-mail: AndyforUSSenator@aol.com
P.O. Box 742
Manchester, NH 03105-0742
Cellphone: (347) 960-9593
Fax (866) 214-3210
Blogs:
www.AndyMartin2020.blogspot.com
www.AndyMartin2020.wordpress.com

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Attention, New Hampshire, Washington, National daybook/assignment and Political editors

---

Andy Martin says New Hampshire officials have a “death wish” going forward to destroy the state’s economy while saving only a handful of lives

Andy says that protecting the medically vulnerable does not mandate impoverishing a million New Hampshire residents

Andy says he will defy the state government’s orders and soon launch a campaign of civil disobedience against the new regulatory state imposed by New Hampshire officials

Andy predicts that if the latest proposals are enacted and enforced, New Hampshire Republicans will be wiped out in November; this is a case of blatant and incompetent political suicide

“They are destroying our New Hampshire,” Andy says. “Why aren’t we following the ‘Swedish model’ instead of the ‘Chinese model?’”

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

(MANCHESTER, NH) (May 1, 2020) --- New Hampshire Republican U. S. Senate candidate Andy Martin says that he objects to the bureaucratic regulatory state that is being imposed on New Hampshire residents. The state is to announce new and continuing regulations, as well as a continuing lock-down of state residents, on May 2nd. An “emergency” declaration has also been renewed by the state. Andy opposes the systematic destruction of New Hampshire, its traditions and its economy.

“It is time for New Hampshire Patriots to stand up and oppose the Stalinist bureaucracy that is about to be dumped on New Hampshire’s residents and businesses,” Andy says. “I not only oppose the continuation of the nonexistent and bogus ‘emergency,’ I oppose the bureaucratic codes that are being used to straightjacket citizens and businesses.

“Public safety and public health are paramount concerns, but when these legitimate concepts are pursued to illegitimate ends, the state is going to collapse. The Supreme Court declared unconstitutional the National Industrial Recovery Act in Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, 295 U.S. 495. The NRA was a regulatory scheme similar to the Covid-19 schemes being imposed on Americans by state officials.

“I would like to present the basis for my opposition and forthcoming civil disobedience:

1. The Deep State and incompetent CDC bureaucrats betrayed the American People

“Americans generally, and Granite Staters, have been betrayed by a mindless Washington bureaucracy and Deep State. When the virus is gone and cooler heads review the history of this medical and economic disaster, the public will be outraged at how the American people were betrayed by incompetent bureaucrats, starting at the Centers for Disease Control (“CDC”). The history of how the incompetent CDC refused to use a simple virus test, developed in less than a week in Germany, and initially created a defective test and then a series of delays before a workable ‘test’ was developed, is a disgrace to our democracy. Germany’s test would have worked fine. But the CDC’s ‘not invented here’ arrogance deprived the medical system of testing ability for weeks and allowed the crisis to get out of hand. The CDC deprived the president and others of meaningful information when it was most needed. If I get to the U. S. Senate, I will work to see the CDC head is fired. He was an incompetent leader and administrator.

2. Of necessity, I support and endorse the state’s prior actions

“When the State of New Hampshire eventually declared an ‘emergency’ and lock-down, it was proceeding blindly. A ‘model’ from Imperial College in London was useless. A similar model from the University of Washington was almost as useless. But government bureaucrats such as Anthony Fauci used these defective models to scare the president and the American people by initially predicting millions of deaths and stampeding our society to adopt a nationwide lock-down approach.

“Nevertheless, in the classic computer expression, ‘garbage in garbage out,’ New Hampshire state officials had garbage from the federal government to work with and developed a plan that was garbage. Thus, because state officials were duped by federal bureaucrats, I give New Hampshire a ‘pass’ on their initial lock-down and ‘emergency.’

3. Why was the Swedish model not used; why was it ignored?

“Sweden is a civilized society. Swedish leaders saw the hysteria enveloping the world and chose a different approach. No, the Swedish model did not completely avoid loss of life or illness. But Sweden never closed its restaurants and bars, never locked-down the people. Instead, Swedish authorities enacted sensible restrictions: groups larger than 50 were banned, large events such as athletic events were barred, and Swedes were asked to exercise common sense. The result: Sweden has a death rate similar to that in the United States. But Sweden’s economy is intact, primary schools are open, and the nation is moving ahead.

“There were and are risks in any approach, including the Swedish system, but Fauci-led statist bureaucrats would not consider anything but medieval quarantines, knowing full well the quarantines would destroy entire industries and might trigger a depression.

“Why is the New Hampshire state government now not looking to Sweden as a model, and insisting on imposing a Fauci-Chinese dictatorship on the Granite State?

4. Today, May 2, there is no “emergency” and no basis for New Hampshire bureaucrats to impose their imperial rule on residents

“In my opinion, the claim that there is a basis for an emergency declaration today, May 2, is an insult to the intelligence and grossly unconstitutional. In my opinion, a bona fide ‘emergency’ should (1) involve a sudden or surprise act; (2) a situation that is out of control or difficult to control; (3) a lack of an established protocol or resources to address the situation.

“In March, the people were incited by the scare tactics broadcast by the national media and Governor Andrew Cuomo’s hysteria that 140,000 ICU units and and 40,000 ventilators were needed immediately. Cuomo also tried to scare the nation by saying ‘You’re next. Tomorrow, you’re New York.’ Well, time has passed, and Manchester is not New York. New Hampshire is not New York.

“Nevertheless, New Hampshire bureaucrats, without much critical thought, declared the original ‘emergency.’ I accepted that action when it was imposed, because the state was given defective modeling information by Washington. My three-factor emergency approach (above) reasonably applied.

“But today there is no coronovirus emergency. There are a handful of corona patients in New Hampshire hospitals.

“But there is a genuine, non-corona virus emergency. New Hampshire’s health care system is begun destroyed by the false emergency, doctors and nurses are being let go. Hospitals are losing hundreds of millions of dollars a month. This money will never be recovered. There is an emergency because sick people with cancer and heart ailments have been deprived of medical care for months. But the ‘emergency’ that was recently renewed is nonexistent. It is a political fraud on the people of the state. Bureaucrats are ignoring the real emergency, the unemployment and critical state of health systems that are being destroyed, while they develop plans to regulate state lakes and beaches. Disgraceful.

5. The scatter-shot approach has killed our senior citizens

“Ironically, while failing to protect the ‘vulnerable,’ on the contrary the emergency and lock-down destroyed the vulnerable. While there are a handful of cases in every age category, the vast majority of deaths were of people over 60 and, proportionately, of nursing home and care home residents. So, by locking down the entire state and pretending the entire state was equally at risk from the virus, we neglected to protect the very groups of people that were in reality vulnerable. The deaths in nursing homes were entirely expected. Nursing homes were neglected; they were the stepchildren of the medical system. So vulnerable seniors were ignored, and died, while state bureaucrats lavished attention on groups that were at minimal risk, claiming they were ‘protecting everyone’ when in reality they were protecting no one.

“The scatter-shot approach not only failed, it is a disgrace to our humanity that we abandoned our most vulnerable citizens to neglect and death. Had competent officials sat down and reviewed input from hospitals and nursing facilities, the anti-virus efforts would have been concentrated on seniors and the critically ill and not on the blunderbuss scattershot approach of imprisoning on 1.3 million New Hampshire residents, almost all of whom were not ill and faced no serious risk. Dr. Benjamin Chan, the state’s ‘epidemiologist,’ proved to be an incompetent bureaucrat. Why hasn’t Chan been fired? Because state government is afraid to admit that Concord officials botched the corona virus response. Fire Chan! He’s worthless.

6. New Hampshire’s economy will not survive the latest regulatory proposals

“State government proposes to impose an extended regulatory regime on state businesses starting Friday. A nonexistent ‘emergency’ is used as the pretext to enslave over a million people and lock them in their homes, deprive their children of an education and impoverish the citizenry.

“Restaurants can’t survive with Concord bureaucrats running their establishments. Salons are being regulated as what services they can and can’t provide. And so on.

“There are probably 150,000 unemployed people in New Hampshire, and many more under-employed. The state’s economy will soon collapse and Democrats will gleefully proclaim Donald Trump the new Herbert Hoover.

7. Civil disobedience is the inevitable outcome

“New Englanders are a pretty law-abiding and civil people. But the Boston Tea Party is also in our history. I foresee massive civil disobedience starting this summer, as Concord bureaucrats try to deprive the people of access to their property, yes, the people own the state, the state does not own the people.

“When the American Revolution began, most people opposed the patriots and there were only a handful of people willing to confront the King of England. So, don’t be fooled by the claim that the vast majority of New Hampshire residents want to be ruled and regulated by Concord bureaucrats. They don’t. As President George Bush once said, ‘[You] will hear from us.’

8. The current rule-and-regulate regime will decimate Republicans in November

“If Republicans as a party do not rise up and oppose the imposition of draconian regulation and restrictions on New Hampshire residents, by the time the virus has passed voters are only going to remember their endless and continuing economic pain, and will take revenge on so-called ‘conservatives’ who refused to open their mouths to oppose the craziness that is/was being imposed on them.

9. The polls are being manipulated to deceive the people

“It is obvious that many people are afraid, especially senior citizens. But the idea that the vast majority of New Hampshire residents want to remain entombed at home, while their jobs disappear and they become impoverished, is nonsense. We are closing county fairs and events, out in the sun and fresh air? Why?

“The motto of this state used to be ‘Live Free or Die.’ Are the bureaucrats going to change the motto to ‘Live Enslaved and Like it?’ President Reagan warned us our freedom and liberty are always endangered by power-hungry bureaucrats. Today, the combined threat posed by the tech titans (Amazon, Twitter, Facebook, Apple, etc.) and the Deep State is an even more insidious than the Cold War. President Trump talks of an ‘invisible enemy.’ The virus may not be visible, but the politicians and malefactors of great wealth are the real enemy and they are increasingly powerful and visible.

10. The battle for the beaches will be a “beetch”

“My family has been going to Hampton Beach for 100 years. Hampton Beach has never closed. There is no reason to close the state’s ocean beaches now. The mantra that New Hampshire will be overrun by hordes of diseased Massachusetts residents is disgraceful and insulting (should Bay Staters just send a check in the mail?). The safest place to be may be a beach. Fresh air and sunlight are virus-killers. But yet the state’s bureaucrats want to kill an entire beach season, and deprive the people of access to the safest place in the state. On what meat do these Caesars feed? We must begin a ‘battle for the beaches’ and liberate our shores from the invaders and Chinese-thinking regulators in Concord.

11. The usurpation of power by “emergency” is unconstitutional

“Government bureaucrats, even elected officials, do not have the power under either the New Hampshire or U. S. Constitutions to rule by government ‘order,’ and control the table seating of restaurants, the access to public property such as shores and lakes, and in general to control every aspect of our daily lives based on a nonexistent ‘emergency.’ The proposed plans to be released Friday are unconstitutional.

“Well, what do you think?” asks Andy Martin. “Live free or live under the bureaucratic/regulatory state being imposed by Concord?”

---

Please feel free to forward and/or post this email

---

LINKS TO THIS STORY: (cut and paste the entire link below and not just the underlined portion):


New citations after emailing:

ANDY MARTIN - A BRIEF BIO:

Andy Martin is a legendary New Hampshire-based muckraker, author, Internet columnist, talk television pioneer, radio talk show host, broadcaster and media critic. With over fifty (50) years of background in radio and television and with decades of intelligence, investigative and analytical experience in Washington, the USA and around the world, Andy provides insight on politics, foreign policy, military and intelligence matters. For a full bio, go to: www.AndyMartin.com. See also www.FirstRespondersOnline.us; www.BoycottABC.com/executive_director.htm

Andy has also been a leading corruption fighter in American politics and courts for over fifty years and is executive director of the National Anti-Corruption Policy Institute. www.AmericaisReadyforReform.com.

He holds a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Illinois College of Law and is a former adjunct professor of law at the City University of New York (LaGuardia CC, Bronx CC).

He is the author of “Obama: The Man Behind the Mask” [www.OrangeStatePress.com] and produced the Internet film “Obama: The Hawaii’ Years” [www.BoycottHawaii.com]. Andy is the Executive Editor and publisher of the “Internet Powerhouse,” blogging at www.contrariancommentary.wordpress.com and www.ContrarianCommentary.com.

Andy’s family immigrated to Manchester, New Hampshire over 100 years ago; today his home overlooks the Merrimack River and he lives around the corner from where he played as a small boy. He is New Hampshire’s leading corruption fighter and Republican Party reformer.

UPDATES:

www.twitter.com/AndyMartinUSA
www.Facebook.com/AndyMartin

Andy’s opinion columns are posted at ContrarianCommentary.com, ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com and ContrarianCommentary.wordpress.com

[NOTE: We try to correct any typographical errors in our stories; find the latest version on our blogs and don’t hesitate to let us know if you find an error.]

----------

To become a regular subscriber to our emails please send an email to andyforussenator@aol.com and place “SUBSCRIBE” in the subject line

© Copyright by Andy Martin 2020 – All Rights Reserved